Tuesday 21 October 2014

7000+ Chinese Officials Busted in Mahjong Gambling Crackdown.

Mahjong GamblingCHINA: Some of the punished officials were playing in fixed matches against rich business men and were "allowed" to win in order to collect the bets, in effect accepting bribes sometimes exceeding 100,000 yuan for just one match.

readmore 


New Uma Rule Rules at Edewecht

edewechtriichi2012-2

EDEWECHT, Germany - How would the participants to the Edewecht 2012 riichi tournament like the new uma? Would it matter to play with the new bonus/penalty system anyway? The Edewecht tournament, which took place today, was the first official EMA competition where the recently revised riichi rules were applied. The changes, apart from the uma, are not significant. Some limit hands, which are hardly ever scored, now are worth less points - that’s pretty much it.

One guy especially was thankful for the modified uma-rule, and that was Alexander Schuler, the rather unexperienced yet skilled player who made his debut on the international stage two years ago during the European riichi championship, where he ended on a modest 53rd place. When organizer Frauke Roos handed over a little extra prize to him for the highest score in one hanchan, he beamed: “That is thanks to the high uma.”

Zero

The uma is in riichi mahjong what table points are in Mahjong Competition Rules, yet it is quite different. In an MCR tournament, you have little chance to catch up with the top players when you have a bad session in which you have zero table points. In riichi, you can be the last at a table so you get a penalty of 30,000 points and yet win the tournament when you sore high hands in the other hanchan (sessions).
The uma has one more advantage. Without it, you could lean back after winning the first hanchan with a huge score. Thanks to the uma, you just have to keep on going for the first, maybe the second position on the subsequent tables. Otherwise, the uma penalty would melt away your margin.
Until last year, the uma in riichi was

1st place +9,000
2nd place +3,000
3rd place -3,000
4th place -9,000


Now this has changed to

1st place +30,000
2nd place +10,000
3rd place -10,000
4th place -30,000


Risks

For calculating the general classification of a tournament, the new uma probably would make no difference at all. But what it changes, is the way players are taking risks. So, after the third hanchan, I found myself back in fourth position in the general ranking. If I would do well in the final session, I might make it to third or even second place.
I started rather well, but after a few more games I dropped to second and then third place at my table. In the South round, I had a great opportunity to come back to first position. I had carefully built up my hand, and eventually had a beautiful point of departure

bam2-1bam2-1dot3-1dot3-1dot2-1crak2-1crak3-1crak4-1crak3-1crak4-1crak6-1dot5-1dot5red-1

 


Then I drew the dream tile: bam2-1
So I had a beautiful waiting hand: san shoku doujun (mixed triple chow): 2 han; tanyo (all simples): 1 han, a chance on iipeikou (pure double chi): 1, pinfu (chicken hand): 1 han, red five: 1 fan. So that would mean a haneman (limit hand of 6 han) at least; when I would declare riichi (waiting game) this might increase to baiman (limit hand of 8~10 han).
But:  when I drew that Bamboo 2, Cor Hoogland, sitting in my upper hand, just had declared riichi. And the Character 6, which I had to discard to turn my hand into a waiting hand, was very dangerous. It was not amongst Cor's discards, and besides, it was a dora tile: a bonus tiles that gives you an extra fan.

Ippatsu

So, what to do? Normally I would have played it safely. I would have discarded one of the safe tiles in my hand, but then I would loose my fair chance of winning that game, and spoil my chance of winning that table. That would not be that bad - if it would not have been for the severe uma penalty: minus 10,000 or maybe even minus 30,000 points.
After some consideration, I decided I would have to take the risk. So I discarded the hot dora tile. Cor thankfully said ‘ron’ (hu), cashed my dora and got rewarded for ippatsu (one shot win). Added to the other han in his hand, I had to pay him 12,000 points.
Eventually, I was last at that table, I dropped from 4th to 9th position. But for the extended uma rule, I never would have taken the risk.
The modified uma makes riichi, and especially the South round, when you have to try and catch up with the other players, more spectacular.

Pastry

edewechtriichi2012-3The new uma was the most talked about topic during this cosy, little tournament at Edewecht. There were twenty players: thirteen from Germany and seven from the Netherlands. The Germans ruled. Alexander Schuler won the first prize, runner-up was Phillip Martin, Richard Stöckeman - lucky as ever - ended in third position. On top of all that: good food and pastry. Looking forward already to come back to Edewecht soon; if possible, for a good game of riichi with an extended uma rule. 

Pictures of the tournament

Final results of the Edewecht Riichi Tournament 2012

Rank. First N.
Last N.Nat.Pts.
1 Alexander Schuler GER 158600
2 Phillip Martin  GER 114800
3 Richard Stöckemann GER 111700
4 Ans Hoogland NDL 80900
5 Cor Hoogland NDL 78700
6 Matthias Köhler GER 44600
7 Uwe Pekau GER 40800
8 Janco Onnink NDL 23100
9 Martin Rep NDL 21000
10 Ilka Stummeyer GER 17900
11 Frauke Roos  GER 4200
12 Gert Jan Davies NDL 400
13 Jens Smikalla GER -30900
14 Fred Schröder GER -34200
15 Nils Jenniches GER -47900
16 Wolfgang Franke GER -87200
17 Harry Kal NDL -97700
18 Anneke Keyl NDL -107200
19 Stefanie Duhme GER -112500
20 Patric Steinke GER -179100
Comments (2)Comments are closed
1Tuesday, 21 February 2012 19:17
Quentin
I'd rather say that the new uma rule encourages players far behind at last place to play big and risky. But other players need to play much safer.

Of course, your "luck accident" repelled you back to the middle, but higher uma reduces the effects of such events: they are "diluted" by the big uma.
2Wednesday, 22 February 2012 12:31
Morten Andersen
Yes I agree with Quentin. Also the hand you describe seems worth playing with any UMA in your position. I would usualy only throw this away if I was ahead at a table or if I was 99% sure that he was waiting for the tile I needed to throw.
yvComment v.2.01.1


Mahjong News | Copyright © 1997-2014 | About Us | Sitemap | Contact