Latest News
- Doris hands over the Gourmet Cup to ‘mummy’ Gabriele
- Did you find Sherlock Holmes’s ‘Full House’?
- Moscow ‘Tesuji’ tournament for Dmitry Mikhailov
- Paris Open 2012 for Simon Bounkéo Fongue
- Axel Eschenburg wins German Riichi Open
- ‘Four Wins of Mrs. Hudson’ - the solution
- Four Wins of Mrs. Hudson
- Programme of the European Championship Riichi Mahjong 2013
- EC Riichi 2013: ten hanchan plus a team competition
- Two miniatures, two solutions
Follow Mahjong News on Facebook!
Related Articles
| It's not the good way to communicate. |
 |
 |
 |
| Written by Sylvain Malbec |
| Tuesday, 17 November 2009 17:15 |
| As said in another article ( http://www.mahjongnews.com/en/index.php/nieuws/reports/436-mjtproblems.html), EMA have trouble to get answers from MJT. If EMA have something to gain, it's make MJT react and communicate with them. It would be better if they react by friendly speach, and not try to turn players against EMA. Giving arguments in favor of MJT will be great too, but they didn't seem to find any. Pointing out there is no alternative servers for now* is not a argument to justify a partnership. *I mean in English and with Chinese Official rules. |
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 21:57 |
This is a comment on "‘What does EMA gain by ending MJT partnership?’"
Mahjong Time
| Latest 5 news from Mahjong Time |
|
