Thursday 23 May 2013

World of Warcraft Mahjong Set

worldofwarcraft

AMSTERDAM, May, 16th - Chinese internet company and World of Warcraft regional publisher NetEase has made a limited edition ‘World of Warcraft: Mists of Pandaria’-themed mahjong set.

Each set costs 1,288 renminbi (USD209) and includes a fully playable mahjong game, complete with tiles, table mats featuring WoW game maps, dividers and chips, all in a thematic wooden carrying case. The board’s decals are designed to look like artwork straight out of World of Warcraft, with a color palette reminiscent of that used for structures and environments in Mists of Pandaria.
Only 1000 of these mahjong sets will be made available worldwide, although the set only appears to be sold through the Chinese-based company. Pre-orders are being taken right now. More pictures are shown on the NetEase website (link below).

readmore

 


Readers’ Comments

204Tuesday, 14 May 2013 10:19
Quentin
I really enjoyed the puzzles, behind most of which I recognize Vitaly's work about MCR and waits analysis he studied years ago.

It is difficult to judge the difficulty of problems, but some did take me some time to solve.

I especially enjoyed the '32nd of December' and its fourth question.

Thanks to Vitaly for the problems, to Martin for hosting the "venue" and congrats to Sylvain and Scott for their success.
203Wednesday, 08 May 2013 12:32
Sylvain Malbec
Q: "each player melded exactly 12 one-suit tiles"
A: two kongs of the same suit (i.e. 8 one-suit tiles) and a kong of wind

So... winds are now suit tiles?
And they are in every suit?
Wow!
Looks like I've misunderstood the question and it was actually an easy one!
202Monday, 06 May 2013 00:15
Scott D. Miller
I really enjoyed the puzzles, which no doubt improved my mahjong game considerably. They forced me to consider wait situations and patterns which I hadn't given much though to before. Congratulations to Sylvain Malbec! And a great thanks to Vitaly Novikov for conceiving the puzzles, and to Martin Rep and Mahjong News for providing the venue.
201Thursday, 25 April 2013 07:07
Scott Miller
I'm not clear on why the time limit was extended an additional three days.

Was it because I was the only one to answer the question within the allotted time?

Just curious.

Thanks.
200Wednesday, 24 April 2013 02:08
Sylvain Malbec
Fourth deal
At first, it looks like each player had three pure melded kongs, two of them separated by two numbers (e.g. 1 and 4), and that their left-side neighbour is waiting for these two said kongs with a ryanmen (e.g. _23_).
But it turns out there are not enough tiles for that.

So, here's the trick:
Watson had: melded: 1111m 4444m 5555m, concealed: 23s EE.
Lestrade had: melded: 1111s 4444s 5555s, concealed: 23p SS.
Holmes had: melded: 1111p 4444p 5555p, concealed: 78m WW.
Mrs. Hudson had: melded: 6666m 9999m, concealed: RRRR(concealed kong) 23m NN, and erronously melded as flowers: 2223m.

It certainly "cut off all conceivable scenarios".

Legally… Robbed

altIt's holiday time. The whole European mahjong world is looking at Mestre in Italy, where the European championship will take place.

Sherlock Holmes will take a little holiday as well. Before that, Mahjong News presents a Sherlock Holmes mahjong story. No solution required - just fun to read.

Enjoy!

Dr. Watson is reading an article in “Mahjong News”:

“At the MCR London championship 2011 some accident took place. Judges had to make an extremely difficult decision. Clarifications could be made only when both rulebooks – Chinese and English – were thoroughly examined.”
So, Mrs. Hudson is playing at MCR tournament. Her hand is:
opened -- altaltalt, altaltalt, altaltalt, concealed -- altalt, altalt.
She picks alt. “Looks like mahjong? Oh, no! Too few points:
4 = Last Tile

2 = Tile Hog
1 = Self-drawn
Totalling = 7 pts.”
“One point is missing, what a pity! Once there is no mahjong I would declare Kong” – she thought.
“Kong!”
Suddenly, very queer thought came to her mind: “I can Rob it!”
“Mahjong!” – she declared proudly.
“Where is mahjong? You have only 7 points!” – questioned one of opponents.
“ I robbed a Kong!”
“But you can’t do it! That Kong is yours!”
“Really? I think I can!” – Mrs. Hudson opened the “Green Book”. – “Let’s call a judge and read out altogether”.


Green Book

Two judges came to the table – British one and Chinese.
“See p.20, description of fan #47 “Robbing The Kong”: “Winning off the tile that somebody adds to a melded pung (to create a Kong). (The points for Last Tile may not be combined.)” – read aloud Mrs. Hudson.
“See the word somebody? I am English, this is my native language. I know what the word somebody means. It can be any person including yourself surely”.
Huge silence pause was broken by Chinese judge.
“You see, madam, there is other text in “Green Book” see end of “Preface” section at p.3”:
“These rules and regulations exist in both Chinese and English editions. As disputes may arise out of a faulty translation or different understandings, they must be settled according to the original Chinese edition.”
“I must assure you Madam, that in Chinese we use Characters [alt] “other person(s)”. That is correct. We undoubtedly have to contact the Rules Committee with the issue occurred. As for your hand we could not count it as mahjong. Though I propose to not penalize you. Simply continue to play after you have made a Kong.”
“Thank you very much!” – said Mrs. Hudson and opened replacement tile. It was alt. I knew it! Hu!”

Comments

This piece of “Sherlock Holmes and Mahjong” series comes in a form of story without questions. The author's intentions were merely to urge players to read the original rules text more carefully.
And here is some quote from some version or Riichi rules ("Toudai-shiki", http://www.ofb.net/~whuang/ugcs/gp/mahjong/mahjong.html) regarding Kong Robbery, :
"3.1.0.8 (1) QUAD STEAL ("Rob a kong", chankan) This is when the winning tile is one that another player has drawn and has attempted to add to an already-melded tri with it. As winning takes precedence over making a quad, this is legal. "
See, there is a big difference between notions "another player" and "somebody”.


Advertisement


Mahjong News | Copyright © 1997-2013 | About Us | Sitemap