It was twenty years ago today
- Details
- Created on Wednesday, 09 September 2009 09:56
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 18:00
- Written by Martin Rep
- Hits: 2956
The latest MahjongNews poll was not the most inspiring: 'Mahjong is played best with plastic / bamboo tiles'. So, not many visitors of MahjongNews filled it in. In the English edition, 20 visitors voted for plastic tiles and 13 for bamboo tiles; in the Dutch edition, these figures were 12 (plastic) and 4 (bamboo). Editor Martin Rep compares the two kinds of mahjong tiles with the old vinyl records of the Beatles with the new ones, which are on sale today.
At my local cd-seller’s, as from today I can buy all my old Beatles records for just 299 euros. Or, who gives a darn, for 249 euros.
That’s an offer you cannot refuse. Fourteen studio albums, for some 21 euros (or US dollars - who gives a darn) each. Digitally remastered. The old mono recordings of Till There Was You or Please Please Me now sound just like they were recorded in 2009, but with the genuine sound of 1963, or 1964.
Granddaddy closes his eyes and his mind wanders back to that winter of 1964. I was eighteen years old and I had saved weeks of my pocket money to buy the long play record ('33 r.p.m. mini-groove’) Beatles For Sale. It cost 18 Dutch guilders. In real money nowadays, that would be 8,50 euros, but everybody knows that for 18 Dutch guilders in 1964 you could buy a lot more than you can buy now for 8,50 euros. Or even for 18 euros.
Better, let’s go back to 1967. At the time, I had my first job at a local newspaper in an Amsterdam suburb. Since I earned some money, and since I was addicted to rock and roll in general and the Beatles in particular, I spent the better part of my pay to records. Nice, vinyl records. Every week I bought a magazine called New Musical Express, which was for sale in Amsterdam, to keep myself up-to-date of the latest news of rock-Mecca - i.e. England. In NME, I read an advertisement of a man who sold UK records. You would write him a letter, he would send you the record, and not until then you had to send him a money order. (Of course, this guy, Francis J. Tandy, had to stop this business after half a year or so, because most of his clients were not exactly the honest type.)
This way, in the late spring of 1967, I ordered the new Beatles record Sgt. Pepper Lonely Hearts Cub Band at Francis J. Tandy’s.
So, I was the very first person in the Netherlands who owned this record. One week before the official release. I remember I went to some birthday event with that brand-new record, carelessly under my arm. Those eyes! Those jaws dropping open!
It is much more than twenty years ago today, but I still have that record, which made history. It features some of the best compositions ever written, such as When I Am Sixty-Four and A Day In The Life.
I still play the songs, and even rather often. But do I use that old vinyl record? I am afraid not. I bought it again some time ago, and this new one is not even a compact disc in cold plastic with a jewel case around it; no, I just acquired a number of digits at the iTunes Store, and the voices of John, Paul, George and Ringo (yes, the latter does the vocals on With A Little Help From My Friends on that record) now come out of my 160 Gb iPod Classic.
Every now and then, I dig up that old piece of vinyl, and I look at it. It is just sooo beautiful, and I am sure that it is still completely intact, even though I played it numerous times - I always guarded over it like an old lady over her virginity.
But I will not put it on the record player anymore. The media has become obsolete, while the message is just as fresh as it was Yesterday.
It is just like that old bamboo mahjong set, which we all still cherish since it is so beautiful. You just don’t use it anymore. A mahjong set today comes in cold plastic - but what a great way to build a straight wall with that cold plastic. Much better than with those old tiles I learned to play with, twenty years ago today.
See the results of the poll

I bought a plastic set from America that was reasonably priced and ALMOST perfect (one tile is very very slightly thinner than all the others, to my annoyance), the tiles are nice and chunky and they build really neat walls (you must build tight neat walls to keep the demons out you know!).
I've searched everywhere for a reasonably priced bone and bamboo set that is neatly coloured and not too bright. I can't find one. I do not like the dazzling white and bright blues and greens. So, for the moment anyway, it's plastic for me.





Happy New Year my friends and I wish you all the best, successful and happiness for 2K13 !
(Private Joke :Année de la baise)
I agree with my virtual friend Senechal on two points. But, These two points of view conflict (or not) :)
> Loto-riichi as a high-ranking French player (NC) would call it. : I AGREE :D
> The problem I have is that this is being used to "make news". It tarnishes whatever people like me perceive to be attempts to improve the individual and overall...
the real problem is not a "makes news" or something like that, the real problem is now I can't trust M.P around the next Event/tables:)
seriously Martin, I can't believe that...
All that fuss for what ??! Really 1K?
Next time, take some tiles into your pockets and try to make Yakuman...
Play for the overall, hmm why not. But please... Next time will do it clean,not like that.
I think, this story you should have expected narrate it in the winter, around the fireplace. Not on Mahjong News... That's all.
Last but not least Garence Kutukdjian, she my mentor, In fact she's RER Mentor ^^
Cheers
NC
Martin Rep
That's a big difference between live and computer play; computers don't let you make mistakes, or bluff!
So then the real question becomes: on who is the onus to declare chombos? Is a player required to self-incriminate?
Personally, I would say no. The penalty clearly exists because players, being human, are capable of mistakes, and the rules take this into account... so mistakes are, according to the rules, part of the game. That mistake could be the player who erroneously declares mahjong, but likewise your opponents also made a mistake in not catching it. In this case, for you anyway, two wrongs did make a right!
But should you feel guilty? I would again say no. You didn't discover your mistake until after you had already irrevocably declared ron, so you didn't do it on purpose. There's no dishonor in being human. And once declared, that hand is out of your control, and the onus falls upon your opponents to verify your win. In competition, there's no obligation to coach your opponent on how to play, so there's no dishonor on your part for your opponents' weakness in not checking your hand.
The problem I have is that this is being used to "make news". It tarnishes whatever people like me perceive to be attempts to improve the individual and overall level of gameplay, especially since MN is the most prominent news outlet for EMA events. The verdict is that there is no improvement, and you don't need to participate in 3 tournaments to figure it out.
I'll keep my money from future events, unless the majority of players come from the #1 English riichi community website. My advice for the rest of you: claim haneman+ every hand. Eventually, people will count...
More importantly, will people take this episode as a learning experience or wake-up call to learn more about Japanese mahjong, or is this the last stop yanked out of the road to turn EMA-sponsored mahjong into "tile-clacking version A" and "tile clacking version B"?
Loto-riichi as a high-ranking French player (NC) would call it.